Du siger, at casinoet fik sorte point, men dets vurdering er stadig 9,7/10, hvilket gør det til et af de bedste valg i henhold til dit websted, så disse sorte point ændrer absolut intet og giver ingen mening.
Derfor siger jeg, at du dækker dem, ellers ville jeg ikke have nogen grund til at sige det.
Ja, det lykkedes mig at få nogle af mine gevinster, du kan se hele historien på klagen.
Nederste linje er, at de stjal de sidste resterende 505 €.
Mit problem med casinoguru er ikke, at de ikke lykkedes for mine sidste stjålne penge på 505€, men udelukkende fordi du har dem PÅ DISPLAY SOM ET TOPKASINO.
Jeg kan ikke understrege nok, at dit 9.7/10 casino er kendt for at være ULOVLIGT og svindlere (TrustPilot og andre sider), og de opererer UDEN LICENS.
Kun ved det faktum, at de opererer i CURACAO, bør give enhver med en smule viden et hint om, hvad de virkelig er.
Bare en simpel hurtig google-søgning:
Curacao eGaming-organet har ry for at tage hænderne fra enhver operatør lige efter at have fået deres månedlige kontingent eller opsætningsgebyrer. Organet vil afholde sig fra at handle på ethvert problem mellem en operatør og dens spillere, selvom brugerne bliver snydt.
Jeg kender mine fakta og hvad jeg taler om her.
Så ja, du ser ud til at dække over sådanne casinoer.
You say the casino got black points, but its rating is still 9.7/10 making it one of the top choices according to your site, so those black points change absolutely nothing and make no sense.
That's why I say you cover for them, otherwise I wouldn't have any reason to state so.
Yes, I managed to get some of my winnings, you can see the whole story on the complaint.
Bottom line is they stole the last remaining 505€.
My issue with casinoguru is not that they didn't succeed for my last 505€ stolen money, but solely because you have them ON DISPLAY AS A TOP CASINO.
I cannot stress enough that your 9.7/10 casino is well known for being ILLEGAL and scammers (TrustPilot and other sites) and they operate WITHOUT LICENSE.
Only by the fact that they operate in CURACAO should give anyone with a bit of knowledge a hint about what they truly are.
Just a simple quick google search:
The Curacao eGaming body has a reputation for taking its hands off any operator right after getting their monthly dues or setup fees. The body will refrain from acting on any issue between an operator and its players, even if the users are being ripped off.
I know my facts and what I'm talking about here.
So yes, you seem to be covering for such casinos.
Redigeret af forfatter 1 måned siden
Automatisk oversættelse: